the winnipeg sandbox
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
the winnipeg sandbox

Latest topics

» Gord Steeves should run for Mayor
by FlyingRat Wed Aug 13, 2014 4:58 pm

» To discontinue?
by EdWin Sat Jul 12, 2014 9:26 pm

» Sandbox breakfast get-together, Saturday, January 25, 2014.
by rosencrentz Fri Apr 11, 2014 11:27 pm

» 2013-14 Bisons/CIS Thread
by Hollywood Tue Apr 01, 2014 11:56 pm

» Katz must resign
by cobragt Mon Oct 28, 2013 5:09 pm

» Best Breakfast/Brunch
by cobragt Mon Oct 28, 2013 5:07 pm

» Manitoba Action Party
by RogerStrong Mon Oct 21, 2013 2:24 pm

» Police Respond to a silent alarm With Guns Drawn
by EdWin Tue Aug 20, 2013 10:10 pm

» Details about Cineplex SuperTicket -- interesting promotion
by MattKel Thu Jul 18, 2013 4:08 pm

» Freep locks out non-subscriber commentary
by Deank Mon Jul 08, 2013 3:58 pm

» 7-year sentence for Berlusconi
by FlyingRat Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:32 pm

» New Stadium
by grumpy old man Mon May 27, 2013 4:34 pm

» Winnipeg News Android App
by grumpy old man Mon May 27, 2013 4:33 pm

» First Post
by grumpy old man Fri May 24, 2013 2:43 pm

» The New Sals at Pembina and Stafford
by grumpy old man Thu Apr 25, 2013 1:35 pm

» Emma Watson wants to do nude scenes for 50 shades of grey movie
by FlyingRat Wed Apr 24, 2013 10:39 am

» Museum finally admits it needs to raise more money priovately.
by FlyingRat Wed Apr 24, 2013 10:32 am

» And You Thought Your Taxes Are High Now!!!
by FlyingRat Wed Apr 24, 2013 10:21 am

» free chocolate sample
by cobragt Sun Mar 31, 2013 6:12 pm

» Do you want a gift certificate for A winnipeg restraunt?
by cobragt Sun Mar 31, 2013 6:12 pm


You are not connected. Please login or register

the winnipeg sandbox » winnipeg sandbox.. » national... » Coaltion Government? Election? Return to Sanity?

Coaltion Government? Election? Return to Sanity?

+11
Electrician
AGEsAces
rosencrentz
eViL tRoLl
grumpy old man
Winklovic
Goth_chic
FlyingRat
LivingDead
Freeman
Deank
15 posters

Go to page : Previous  1 ... 6 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next

Go down  Message [Page 10 of 14]

FlyingRat


moderator
moderator

That would be a good safe word, since it doesn't come up in everyday conversation.... ;-)

Deank

Deank
contributor eminence
contributor eminence

try saying it with a gagball in your mouth though..
its not that easy

Guest

Anonymous
Guest

Imo, you are both wrong. I say it almost every day...granted that I don't use gagballs...but my tongue is always firmly planted....

Deank

Deank
contributor eminence
contributor eminence

is the three stooges picture they talk of in this article.. "our" picture of the three stooges?

http://www.winnipegsun.com/News/Canada/2008/12/03/7618016.html
Another of the more than 100 pictures portrayed all three opposition leaders as the Three Stooges.

LivingDead

LivingDead
general-contributor
general-contributor

Canned response:

Quote: Office of the Governor General


Thank you for writing to the Office of the Secretary to the Governor General. We appreciate hearing your views and suggestions. Responses to specific inquiries can be expected within two to three weeks. Please note that many of the e-mails we receive are in the form of comments or opinions and do not receive a reply. Content that is of an offensive or commercial nature will not receive a response.

Due to the large quantity of incoming correspondence, we also cannot reply to e-mails inquiring about the status of a previous request. Thank you for your understanding.




Merci d'avoir écrit au Bureau du Secrétaire du Gouverneur général. Nous apprécions vos points de vue et vos suggestions. Il faut prévoir deux ou trois semaines pour une réponse à une demande précise. Veuillez noter que dans bon nombre de cas, les courriels reçus consistent en commentaires ou opinions qui ne nécessitent pas de réponse. Pour les courriels dont le contenu est de mauvais goût ou de nature commerciale, il n'y aura aucune réponse.

À cause du nombre élevé de la correspondance, nous ne pouvons répondre aux courriels s'enquérant de l'état d'une demande antécédente. Merci de votre compréhension.

http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare

Deank

Deank
contributor eminence
contributor eminence

yup mine said that too except oddly enough it had this extra line thrown in.

We have been watching you for many months at her excellency's request. She thinks you are uber hot and because of her attraction to you, she may indeed have to ignore your email, lest she be deemed partial to your cause because of your hotness.

wolfboy

wolfboy

plans for Bloc/Reform alliance in 2000.

so the Cons, in 2 forms, have done this twice. but i guess for some reason,
that's different than when the Libs/NDPs do it?

not sure why, but whatevs.

and GothChic-- please.

not that i really ever come on here, but when i do, i take it with a "grain of salt", since it's mostly just half a dozen angry conservatives (redundant, i know) howling about how everyone else is stupid/evil/treasonous.

here's a link to the article. yep. facts, people. facts.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20081203.wquebec1203/BNStory/National/?page=rss&id=RTGAM.20081203.wquebec1203

LivingDead

LivingDead
general-contributor
general-contributor

It is Time for Canada to have a referendum. A national referendum asking if Quebec should leave confederation take its share of the national debt, including at least 53 billion they owe Canada for other reasons. Yes or NO.

Then Canada and Quebecois can then say to the small minority of political elite who are fooling Quebecois and Canadians alike by the Big Lie. Time to vote, in or out. Then Canada can get back to a parliamentary system that is not weak and is played for fools by the bloc's rhetoric.

This is the only way to prevent Bull sh1t from happening in Parliament like it is now.

Thoughts?

http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare

LivingDead

LivingDead
general-contributor
general-contributor

wolfboy wrote:plans for Bloc/Reform alliance in 2000.

so the Cons, in 2 forms, have done this twice. but i guess for some reason,
that's different than when the Libs/NDPs do it?

not sure why, but whatevs.

and GothChic-- please.

not that i really ever come on here, but when i do, i take it with a "grain of salt", since it's mostly just half a dozen angry conservatives (redundant, i know) howling about how everyone else is stupid/evil/treasonous.

here's a link to the article. yep. facts, people. facts.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20081203.wquebec1203/BNStory/National/?page=rss&id=RTGAM.20081203.wquebec1203

Wolf Boy... Bloc party = Treason, Dealing with Bloc party = Treason.

http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare

LivingDead

LivingDead
general-contributor
general-contributor

Deank wrote:yup mine said that too except oddly enough it had this extra line thrown in.

We have been watching you for many months at her excellency's request. She thinks you are uber hot and because of her attraction to you, she may indeed have to ignore your email, lest she be deemed partial to your cause because of your hotness.

LAMO.. And monkeys will fly out of your bum.

http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare

Goth_chic

Goth_chic
uber-contributor
uber-contributor

wolfboy wrote:plans for Bloc/Reform alliance in 2000.

so the Cons, in 2 forms, have done this twice. but i guess for some reason,
that's different than when the Libs/NDPs do it?

not sure why, but whatevs.

and GothChic-- please.

not that i really ever come on here, but when i do, i take it with a "grain of salt", since it's mostly just half a dozen angry conservatives (redundant, i know) howling about how everyone else is stupid/evil/treasonous.

here's a link to the article. yep. facts, people. facts.

[url=http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20081203.wquebec1203/BNStory/National/?page=rss&id=RTGAM.20081203.wquebec1203
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20081203.wquebec1203/BNStory/National/?page=rss&id=RTGAM.20081203.wquebec1203[/quote[/url]]

LOL..actually I'm not a conservative...:-)

Deank

Deank
contributor eminence
contributor eminence

"angry conservatives (redundant, i know) "
hehe. thats good.

wolfboy

wolfboy

well, GC, you may not vote con, but don't kid yourself.

and LD-- by your logic, Mr. Harper, Preston Manning, anyone from the Reform Party, and most Conservatives, are therefore traitors.

so who does that leave?

FlyingRat

FlyingRat
moderator
moderator

small-a angry conservatives, or big-A Angry Conservatives? ;-)

Electrician

Electrician
general-contributor
general-contributor

Wolfboy, these three parties bashed each other without ever talking about economic issues... Now they won't even wait for PM Harper to present his new budget. Hey, if you wanna take down a govt. wait for a reason to do so. Otherwise, shut up and let the man do his job.
My far away daily rant.

http://www.new.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1416203996

wolfboy

wolfboy

oh, and by the way, LD, you should (uh, oh, here i go with "FACTS" again) find out who these Bloc Quebecois people are.

former Conservatives, mostly.

Goth_chic

Goth_chic
uber-contributor
uber-contributor

wolfboy wrote:oh, and by the way, LD, you should (uh, oh, here i go with "FACTS" again) find out who these Bloc Quebecois people are.

former Conservatives, mostly.

Which I find even more disturbing...aligning themselves with socialists...they must be power hungry. Wink

LivingDead

LivingDead
general-contributor
general-contributor

wolfboy wrote:well, GC, you may not vote con, but don't kid yourself.

and LD-- by your logic, Mr. Harper, Preston Manning, anyone from the Reform Party, and most Conservatives, are therefore traitors.

so who does that leave?
I dont see anyone bringing forth a document signed by the bloc and the reform or the canadian alliance or the PC's or the Conservative party.

Put your money where you mouth is. DION/Layton and Gilles have a signed document and they did in on TV. That is dealing with the devil. and giving the block all the power it needs to keep Ottawa weak so they can rule by fear.

Treason. plain and simple.

http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare

Deank

Deank
contributor eminence
contributor eminence

The Bloc are the only smart ones in that coalition.
No matter what they do in it, it will only make them look that much better come next election.

FlyingRat

FlyingRat
moderator
moderator

Bah... let them separate...

grumpy old man

grumpy old man
administrator
administrator

I'm not sure I'd equate one newspaper column as fact but at least it is not one Conservative/sandbox basher's opinion now it is two peeps opinion's.

Let's say that is fact. It does not make the current situation any more tenable. The Bloc should never be in the unique position of deciding Canada's fate.

Deank

Deank
contributor eminence
contributor eminence

Lets not forget it was the alliance that caused the bloc to be the official opposition for a term.

Guest

Anonymous
Guest

They should not even be there as they refuse to pledge alligence to Canada .

Goth_chic

Goth_chic
uber-contributor
uber-contributor

I am all for Quebec separating if that's what they want then great. As long as they do it all on their own no help from Ottawa. :-)

Guest

Anonymous
Guest

Yes and the alliance was the conservatives in hiding .

Deank

Deank
contributor eminence
contributor eminence

and no party is willing to make that a rule as they know it would totally sink their chances in any riding in Quebec in the next federal election.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 10 of 14]

Go to page : Previous  1 ... 6 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next

the winnipeg sandbox » winnipeg sandbox.. » national... » Coaltion Government? Election? Return to Sanity?

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum