Glad I don't live in West K

And, of course, the cops don't speak of their defeats

Why would they, they arrest and chuck in jail, the courts threw them out on to the street or gave them a very lenient sentence .
Again it is the courts not the police there is a line between their jobs .

I think that the process is as follows:
The police investigate, and turn over their results to the Crown Attorneys, who decide if they have a strong enough case to win in court!

That is pretty simple. Cases that are stayed are the ones where there is not enough evidence to get a conviction.
GGF- for us to win a $10,000 award for your arrest, please ask your lawyer /student if you must have an acquital, or not guilty result!
I don't remember the rule covering unlawful detention/arrest.

Pavolo wrote:And, of course, the cops don't speak of their defeats

Why would they, they arrest and chuck in jail, the courts threw them out on to the street or gave them a very lenient sentence .
Again it is the courts not the police there is a line between their jobs .

Apples and oranges comparison.

There are two very different dynamics at play here.

1) Police make a solid arrest and justice system screws it up.
B) Police make a bogus arrest or the police screw up the details.

One of these things by all means defend the police. The other? Maybe not so much eh?

"I think that the process is as follows:
The police investigate, and turn over their results to the Crown Attorneys, who decide if they have a strong enough case to win in court!'

Not so. The police rarely speak to the crown berfore laying charges.

Even if you keep repeating this nonsense, it won't make it correct.

THE POLICE LAY CHARGES ALL BY THEMSELVES!

It is the Crown that has the final say as to whether charges will be pursued or dropped.

Of course. But the police lay the charges.

I must be mixing up how my Federal Case went! Revenue Canada investigated me, bullshitted the Crown, and the Crown charged me. Most of the charges were tossed out, but only after a 2 week trial, which I am sure cost at least $100 per day! lol

Ahhh....the Feds are different.

Revenue canada are SPECIAL!! lol I could write a book if I could remember the details.
I had one person phoning me with tips. He advised me to ask how the investigation was going regarding the guy who was after me, regarding this guy's business , re: pornography!
Funny they never answered me, but later when I put in a request under the freedom of information, there was correspondence amongst the person running the Manitoba division, that "there must be a leak in security". They were really concerned that I would ask about it in court.

heh .. not sure if the guy still does it, but at one time there was a weekly update from a Rev Can employee as to all the "misdeeds" of rev can employees.

Court documents outlining the reason for the delay have been sealed.
his client may plead guilty to a lesser charge to avoid jail time.
We provided the attorney with considerable exonerating documentation and information
agents swooped down on his , home at 8:30 a.m. and rousted his family from bed
All of the above statements are not from GGF , but who cares as the statements make it interesting.

JTF- you got to tell us your story to keep things interes

Rosencrentz you said:

GGF- for us to win a $10,000 award for your arrest, please ask your lawyer /student if you must have an acquital, or not guilty result!
I don't remember the rule covering unlawful detention/arrest.

1st of all I will plead not guilty to the mischief enjoyment of property charge and then it will be up to the "crown to prove me guilty" and...

And an aquital or not guilty in the mischief charge is a separate issue...and...

And because I still will have an upcoming law suit for all the "Harassment by the WPS" surrounding the 3 Summons and also the 30+ arbitrary WPS visits one way or the other to add with and or without unlawful detention/arrest and the mischief enjoyment of property charges...and...

And the only reason I haven't filed a LOL! LERA complaint yet with the 3 Summons etc is because the 3 Summons are evidence against the same 2 WPS that collected the nut statement on Nov 17th and because the same 2 WPS are also the ones that issued 2 of the Summons...and...

And if you think about this for a moment...All the law student has to do is walk in court with the 2 Summons issued by the 2 WPS and say...

Oh my god the 2 WPS can't even write up a proper Municipal Noise By Law Summons if a noise violation existed against GGF so should we trust or be comfortable with the same 2 WPS collecting a witness's statement and being able to properly write it down or fill a witness's statement out or collect a statement to consider justifying the mischief enjoyment of property charge against GGF?...Hum!...and...

And I haven't touched on the issue of the mischief enjoyment of property charges yet and only on the 2 WPS that collected the statement from the nut and or the nuts statement which is also full of indiscretions etc...and...

And one way or the other the crown will have to have some sort of case or evidence in front of them before the crown will even consider wanting to "proceed" and go to trial on the mischief enjoyment of property charges...GGF

Pav you said:

"I think that the process is as follows:
The police investigate, and turn over their results to the Crown Attorneys, who decide if they have a strong enough case to win in court!'

Pav your statement is completely wrong...and...

JTF you said:

Not so. The police rarely speak to the crown berfore laying charges.

Even if you keep repeating this nonsense, it won't make it correct.

THE POLICE LAY CHARGES ALL BY THEMSELVES!

And JTF your statement is correct and...

And Miz point you said...

It is the Crown that has the final say as to whether charges will be pursued or dropped.

And Miz point your statement is also correct...GGF

....and wasn't someone supposed to appear in court today...and...

Freeman you said:

....and wasn't someone supposed to appear in court today...and...

Sorry man if I didn't get back to you sooner...I have been really busy working on a few things at the moment and I did appear on March 04th and all went "extremely well"...and that's all I can offer you at the moment with more when I get a chance to which is hopefully soon...GGF

Hmmmm....curiouser and curiouser.

GGF wrote:Pav you said:

"I think that the process is as follows:
The police investigate, and turn over their results to the Crown Attorneys, who decide if they have a strong enough case to win in court!'

Pav your statement is completely wrong...and...

JTF you said:

Not so. The police rarely speak to the crown berfore laying charges.

Even if you keep repeating this nonsense, it won't make it correct.

THE POLICE LAY CHARGES ALL BY THEMSELVES!

And JTF your statement is correct and...

And Miz point you said...

It is the Crown that has the final say as to whether charges will be pursued or dropped.

And Miz point your statement is also correct...GGF

Maybe you should go take law first2 years and I might friccking believe you .

And yes you are right jtf depending on how and what the charge is , they do not consult for all charges .

Pav you said:

Maybe you should go take law first2 years and I might friccking believe you .

Pav I will only offer the following to you for the moment...You would be tremendously surprised in relation to what I already know or don't know about "Law"...GGF

I thought that Winnipeg had a Law that only Jewish people could be lawyers? lol
Or older 65 year old Jewish types who, too late in life realized that he should have gone "to school", as his Mom told him!

GGF wrote:Pav you said:

Maybe you should go take law first2 years and I might friccking believe you .

Pav I will only offer the following to you for the moment...You would be tremendously surprised in relation to what I already know or don't know about "Law"...GGF

Wait a sec, you're not friccking challenging Pav's two years of law are you? It's TWO YEARS for gawd's sake...

Then you would not have said this if you know


Pav you said:

"I think that the process is as follows:
The police investigate, and turn over their results to the Crown Attorneys, who decide if they have a strong enough case to win in court!'

Pav your statement is completely wrong...and...

Pav you said:

"I think that the process is as follows:
The police investigate, and turn over their results to the Crown Attorneys, who decide if they have a strong enough case to win in court!'

Pav your statement is completely wrong...and...

Ok then Pav explain in which way your statement is perhaps right and try and provide something to back it up with please?...GGF

None of the City of Winnipeg laws work if you live in the West Kildonan area!

Rosencrentz you said:

None of the City of Winnipeg laws work if you live in the West Kildonan area!

That's cause #3 write their own laws as it appears...GGF