Yes. It's said you have to work most of the day if you own your own business. Have you considered getting into another line of work? You seem stressed. >.<
the winnipeg sandbox
Winnipeg's Biggest Problem
Miz point wrote:death128 wrote:Even the criminals create jobs for police and judges and lawyers. Wait? Who's working right now?
SO AM I......I work for myself and finding work, additional contracts, selling my work, promoting my work is A FULL TIME JOB with no hope of CPP, EI EI OOOOOO, subsidized anything (god I NEED new glasses big time and a teeth cleaning and Xray) and add to that mix other issues which some on this board know about?
I am fu*king FED UP with having to even look at those who crowd the sidewalk in front of the hellfare office who do not look like they are hurting smoking their cigarettes, stinking of booze, in some cases dressed in new FUBU duds......
Fuggedaboudit......to hell with it.....to hell with it all.
umcrouc0 wrote:Well, this is the real world and nothing's that black and white. There are plenty of programs offered to help, but are they the correct programs for the people who need help? Having a program that's supposed to help people get training and education isn't much use if it's not structured in a way that will actually be effective at getting training and education to the people who need it. Providing 'something' is different from providing the correct thing. The programs are mostly setup by the same government that makes this flawed EI system. So what are the odds that they messed up unemployment so badly, but managed to do a good job on the other programs mean to deal with the same issue?
grumpy old man wrote:umcrouc0 wrote:Well, this is the real world and nothing's that black and white. There are plenty of programs offered to help, but are they the correct programs for the people who need help? Having a program that's supposed to help people get training and education isn't much use if it's not structured in a way that will actually be effective at getting training and education to the people who need it. Providing 'something' is different from providing the correct thing. The programs are mostly setup by the same government that makes this flawed EI system. So what are the odds that they messed up unemployment so badly, but managed to do a good job on the other programs mean to deal with the same issue?
I believe we have too many agencies which work at cross purposes and are loaded with redundancies. I say get rid of them all, and pour all that money into the sandbox and her members.
Seriously, we need to reduce the agencies to a well considered few.
I'm proud to be a Canadian
Pass me another beer
I'm proud to be a Canadian
Hold my seat while i take a piss
Our prime minister sucks dogshit through his nose
His ex-wife gets brown showers from Mick Jagger
The only reason we live in fricking igloos
Is our government makes a living licking sh1t holes
I'm proud to be a Canadian
Pass me another welfare check
I'm proud to be a Canadian
Hold my seat while i go out and ca$h it
I'm proud to be a Canadian
Pass me another Eskimo
I'm proud to be a Canadian
Hold my seat while i frick her up the a hole
Im relying on the principle that there will always be somebody who wants to work to get more -- work to get rich, even. This ain't much of a stretch either -- how many people do you know who actually GO on welfare. There are many reasons - a) you can't get rich on welfare, b) most people want more out of life than to sit around doing nothing.Freeman wrote:egomaniac wrote:Freeman wrote:Hear, hear, GC. There is just no way that anyone can justify that it is acceptable for the rest of us to support someone who just doesn't want to get off their ass. To use the old argument, what is all of us took the same attitude?
why tho? Why would it even be unfair... your tax dollars would allow you to sit on your ass all day long too -- if you want. just like "health care".. if im not sick, i don't want to pay for somebody else being sick. Paying taxes gives us the luxury of supporting the life of all -- even if all means i don't wanna work.
So, if we all sat on our asses, who would be paying the taxes so we could all sit on our asses?
egomaniac wrote:Im relying on the principle that there will always be somebody who wants to work to get more -- work to get rich, even. This ain't much of a stretch either -- how many people do you know who actually GO on welfare. There are many reasons - a) you can't get rich on welfare, b) most people want more out of life than to sit around doing nothing.Freeman wrote:egomaniac wrote:Freeman wrote:Hear, hear, GC. There is just no way that anyone can justify that it is acceptable for the rest of us to support someone who just doesn't want to get off their ass. To use the old argument, what is all of us took the same attitude?
why tho? Why would it even be unfair... your tax dollars would allow you to sit on your ass all day long too -- if you want. just like "health care".. if im not sick, i don't want to pay for somebody else being sick. Paying taxes gives us the luxury of supporting the life of all -- even if all means i don't wanna work.
So, if we all sat on our asses, who would be paying the taxes so we could all sit on our asses?
Just a thought anyway...
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|