Osborne? Can't recall exactly. I'll keep an eye out...
the winnipeg sandbox
Go to page : 1, 2, 3
Deank wrote:not sure about diamond lanes on a two lane though
Deank wrote:not sure about diamond lanes on a two lane though
St Norberter wrote:Been riding it all week.
Surprised how many people are on the 170 after 9pm.
Between Transitway, stop changes and service changes, this is waay, waay better for me!!
grumpy old man wrote:I haven't taken a bus in Winnipeg in decades. I seriously considered taking it tp Jet games but it is just too damned convenient to drive and park. That said, when they start building on the parking lot I use for Jet games I may reconsider as the bus is at my front door...
Bretton Woods wrote:I dont understand why Winnipeg Transit is unable to make a bus priority lane down the center boulevard of Pembina Hwy as the rapid transit link. Cars would have to get out of the way when a bus is coming, priority light changes, etc.
grumpy old man wrote:Platforms? It's possible if the idea has merit. Maybe it is one way with traffic and two way off peak times with ROWs?
Anything is possible...
Electrician wrote:They have something similar in the suburbs of Bruxelles, Belgium. Although the boulevard there is more than twice wider than Inkster Blvd. The stops are actually situated between shops and stores and there aren't any stops along the boulevard area. The first types of transit had their own two-way area situated on one side of the road, but these have long since been eliminated, making way to wider roads and normal busses for transit.
Or, perhaps I was not clear enough... anything is possible.sputnik wrote:grumpy old man wrote:Platforms? It's possible if the idea has merit. Maybe it is one way with traffic and two way off peak times with ROWs?
Anything is possible...
Diamond lanes make more sense.
Putting a two lane busway down the middle of Pembina along with platforms and potentially pedestrian bridges will shrink Pembina down to a single lane in each direction.
grumpy old man wrote:Perhaps one lane is installed. Have it one way during rush hours and then two way, with "right-of-ways" to manage flow.
I don't know, if it chews up too much real estate maybe we expand the roadway.
Or maybe not.
Anyhoo I'm not advocating it. I'm trying to have a conversation around it...
Go to page : 1, 2, 3
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum