F YOU WINNIPEG FREE PRESS POLL

Goth_chic wrote:Flatulence?

I swear it wasn't me. I would place my money on Deank...

SuperNaut wrote:Whatever you say miz pointless.

I do believe, based on the above remark, that my point has already been made....hahahaha.....too easy.

To get back on topic,

I find most freep polls to be BS and I do get a good laugh at of most of the comments. Good on you deank for posting the comment you did.

Most polls, period, are BS at best as they are not indicative nor ever could be of an entire voting populace.

SuperNaut wrote:I agree 110%. Welcome to the sandbox you are a breath of fresh-air.

Aww shucks

"I could outlast every guy underwater whom I worked with....now why is that? "

cause they were looking at your boobies?

Yeah they probably were and that would have led to faster breathing etc- all that excitement and stimulation.....silly boys. When will they ever learn?

Deank wrote:"I could outlast every guy underwater whom I worked with....now why is that? "

cause they were looking at your boobies?

LMAO



shhh....don't tell'em that!

heh... NDP sure know how to hammer on polls like this eh?

Sam Katz 36%
Judy Wasylycia-Leis 52%
Neither, I'd abstain or spoil 10%

Total Votes: 6057

Polls mean nothing. We shall see who comes out on top after all ballots are counted.

Mizz well I do not disagree with your put down of the way things happen or run it will only change when women take the chance to run for the top job . Sitting condemning everything male is not going to get that done . You just sound 70's

Pav, sitting there and misinterpreting everything I say to be anti-male is so seventies, eighties, nineties and now......

Mizz And as per usual the usual sarcasm instead of discussion , like said if you want it to change, run to change it . As we men seem to be not capable of doing it .

Kim Campbell didn't do too well.

Susan Thompson was a wash-out imo. (What did she do anyhoo?)

Lillian Thomas just sat back and brought zilch to the party.

Jenny Gerbasi only works for herself.

The women can be just as bad.

More and more wimmin are running for office in Canada and elsewhere. Australia just elected their first female PM. I think we can all agree things are much improved in Canada for wimmin today from 20 years ago, 50 years ago, 100 years ago.

But there are major fundamental differences between the way wimmin think and act and min think and act. Much of that may never change. And despite the advances wimmin have made in business and politics there will be differences in how they are perceived by others, by min AND wimmin, until they've 100+ years of success under their belts.

JTF wrote:Kim Campbell didn't do too well.

Susan Thompson was a wash-out imo. (What did she do anyhoo?)

Lillian Thomas just sat back and brought zilch to the party.

Jenny Gerbasi only works for herself.

The women can be just as bad.

This will likely provoke a number of lists of min that have failed.

It does help to illustrate my point though. There needs to be many more examples of great and continual success. Not just the occasional success.

Absolutely I get tired of people who blame one sex for their problems, when it is the society we have created from day one . Not that women get a fair deal sometimes but either work to change society which is happening , Or accept it.

I'm not sure success or failure has anything to do with gender, possibly sex, but not gender.

....and what is successful is subjective as well....take Marg Thatcher for example....

You didn't take her did you , You did'nt

Well, to be honest, she and The Queen (the real one and not Elton John) were on my bucket to-do list, but that ain't going too well for me.....

JTF wrote:I'm not sure success or failure has anything to do with gender, possibly sex, but not gender.

....and what is successful is subjective as well....take Marg Thatcher for example....

Huh? Sex? Gender? Lack of sex? Sado masochistic sex? Vanilla sex? Butt-reaming sex? Sex, as a defining force for success - well I would be led to believe that if one were wanting to win the top awards in the adult entertainment field, well then perhaps "sex" may matter in terms of measuring success?

Reading the last few statements on this page (and I am left shaking my head in that once again certain truisms are misinterpreted as being of a particular philosophical bent) some of you are not understanding certain fundamentals - those being that women are judged by a different set of standards than men and as long as that continues there will never be a level playing field...Legislate equality all you like but to some of us it is nothing but forced, PC lipservice that has little application in the real world.

And Pav...please stop putting words into my mouth.....being that you have a difficult time articulating your own POV what gives you the right to believe that you can speak for me?