'An attack on Israel would be considered

rosencrentz · 1 'An attack on Israel would be considered Wed Feb 17, 2010 5:30 pm

rosencrentz

uber-contributor

Number of posts : 9945
Registration date : 2008-10-05

Junior Foreign Affairs minister Peter Kent is suggesting Canada stands ready to throw its full military weight behind Israel, telling a Toronto publication that “an attack on Israel would be considered an attack on Canada
So jgh what about them apples? lol

rosencrentz · 2 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Wed Feb 17, 2010 5:32 pm

rosencrentz

uber-contributor

Number of posts : 9945
Registration date : 2008-10-05

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/blogs/bureau-blog/an-attack-on-israel-would-be-considered-an-attack-on-canada/article1470211/

Deank · 3 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Wed Feb 17, 2010 5:34 pm

Deank

contributor eminence

Number of posts : 28509
Registration date : 2008-09-28

So without even looking at the reason for the attack Canada will just side with Israel? That is just bizarre.

I can understand standing beside/behind ones allies. But what is say Israel launches one of its nukes "it does not have" on Iran and the rest of the world decides to respond in force against Israel... we side with Israel?

yay us..

rosencrentz · 4 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Wed Feb 17, 2010 5:42 pm

rosencrentz

uber-contributor

Number of posts : 9945
Registration date : 2008-10-05

Seems to me that when Germany invaded Poland in 1939, Great Britain was automatically at war, because Great Britain had the same type of agreement. This would prevent anyone from attacking Israel, because of Canada's mighty reputation! Can you imagine a country hostile to Israel ,quaking in its bed, because of the chance that Canada would fly some of its helicopters over its soil? Why the death rate from falling pieces of parts alone would prevent any attack!

Guest · 5 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:04 pm

Guest

Guest

Actually, our Canadian Military kicks ass. They are the best in the world.

Guest · 6 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:09 pm

Guest

He will be reprimanded from Czar Harper Iam sure when ever he and Czar get home and back to work. 'An attack on Israel would be considered Icon_smile

rosencrentz · 7 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:09 pm

rosencrentz

uber-contributor

Number of posts : 9945
Registration date : 2008-10-05

As soon as a war breaks out I am contacting Mossad to pick up DeanK, and take him into "our" army!

Guest · 8 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:11 pm

Guest

'An attack on Israel would be considered Lol

What to steal and eat the other Armys food and beer.

rosencrentz · 9 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:33 pm

rosencrentz

uber-contributor

Number of posts : 9945
Registration date : 2008-10-05

Exactly!

Deank · 10 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Wed Feb 17, 2010 11:18 pm

Deank

contributor eminence

Number of posts : 28509
Registration date : 2008-09-28

Pavolo wrote: What to steal and eat the other Armys food and beer.

LOL count me in!

wpg_idiot · 11 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Wed Feb 17, 2010 11:23 pm

wpg_idiot

contributor

Number of posts : 373
Registration date : 2009-03-24

I think its pathetic that just because we put some muscle into our military, we should be flexing it. Our military should be put to use in good will missions, not retalitory or pre-emptive strikes that do not occur on Canadian soil.

rosencrentz · 12 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:02 pm

rosencrentz

uber-contributor

Number of posts : 9945
Registration date : 2008-10-05

wpg_idiot- The Canadian Army is in Afghanistan for a very good reason- they are sending back cheap cocaine, all to help us older types to control our pain!

Goth_chic · 13 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:04 pm

Goth_chic

uber-contributor

Number of posts : 5608
Registration date : 2008-09-27

No Rosen Afghanistan is good for heroin not coke. Get your facts straight! Wink

Triniman · 14 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:51 pm

Triniman

general-contributor

Number of posts : 4054
Registration date : 2008-09-28

rosencrentz wrote:Junior Foreign Affairs minister Peter Kent is suggesting Canada stands ready to throw its full military weight behind Israel, telling a Toronto publication that “an attack on Israel would be considered an attack on Canada
So jgh what about them apples? lol

Would an attack on Canada be considered an attack on Israel, thus having them join us in battle to defend ourselves? I hope so!

Freeman · 15 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Mon Jul 19, 2010 5:39 am

Freeman

uber-contributor

Number of posts : 6481
Registration date : 2008-09-27

wpg_idiot wrote:I think its pathetic that just because we put some muscle into our military, we should be flexing it. Our military should be put to use in good will missions, not retalitory or pre-emptive strikes that do not occur on Canadian soil.

What do you define as a "good will mission" considering that you are speaking about the military?

rosencrentz · 16 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Mon Jul 19, 2010 7:51 am

rosencrentz

uber-contributor

Number of posts : 9945
Registration date : 2008-10-05

Goth_Chic- Do you mean to tell me that I have been purchasing the wrong white powder from our troops that I meet at the coffee shops?

rosencrentz · 17 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Mon Jul 19, 2010 7:55 am

rosencrentz

uber-contributor

Number of posts : 9945
Registration date : 2008-10-05

Triniman- Word has it from Israel that Israel is denying any relationship with Canada, as they don't want to appear weakened with the responsibility of having to come and rescue Candian troops being transported in Canadian helicoptors!

Guest · 18 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Mon Jul 19, 2010 9:14 am

Guest

Freeman wrote:

wpg_idiot wrote:I think its pathetic that just because we put some muscle into our military, we should be flexing it. Our military should be put to use in good will missions, not retalitory or pre-emptive strikes that do not occur on Canadian soil.

What do you define as a "good will mission" considering that you are speaking about the military?

Isn't that what our GG does?

Our military aren't there to be social workers or diplomats imo. They're trained to fight and kill primarily and that's what they should stick to.

grumpy old man · 19 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:02 am

grumpy old man

administrator

Number of posts : 17663
Registration date : 2008-09-27

There was a time when that was the primary purpose of Canadian troops (peace-keepers, then peace-makers). Now they're doing what an army should be doing...

The more relevant questions should be have we done enough yet and should we get the hell out of that country.

I say yes and yes.

Guest · 20 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:56 am

Guest

Wouldn't our efforts then have been wasted?

Deank · 21 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:59 am

Deank

contributor eminence

Number of posts : 28509
Registration date : 2008-09-28

Apparently there are "tons" of "taliban supporters" pouring into afghanistan right now which is going to make for a very difficult time for our troops. Are our efforts perhaps already wasted?

AGEsAces · 22 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Mon Jul 19, 2010 11:08 am

AGEsAces

moderator

Number of posts : 6890
Registration date : 2008-09-28

really? you would think all the taliban supporters would stay away from afghanistan.

By pooling them all together, they create themselves a target for a strategic military strike.

Deank · 23 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:41 pm

Deank

contributor eminence

Number of posts : 28509
Registration date : 2008-09-28

ahh here we go.

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/canada/breakingnews/flood-of-taliban-supporters-spells-rough-summer-for-canadian-troops-in-panjwaii-98732639.html

PANJWAII, Afghanistan - Soldiers in the Panjwaii district west of
Kandahar city are getting the full impact of foreign fighters coming in
for the summer fighting season.
Maj. Eleanor Taylor, the commander of a combat team at
one of the forward operating bases, says there has been more contact in
the past month than the previous battlegroup received during its tour.

But she notes summer is usually the busiest time and there are
both Waziri fighters from a remote region of Pakistan and Pakistani
fighters themselves.
Taylor says villagers near the base live in constant fear
at this time of year and letters warning of retaliation for anyone who
works with NATO are becoming more commonplace.
She adds the Taliban are "brutal and cruel" and aren't
bound by North American-style morality.
To the west of the base is a 'no mans land', where NATO
forces avoid and the Taliban are free to roam freely.
Love those last two lines eh?

AGEsAces · 24 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:59 pm

AGEsAces

moderator

Number of posts : 6890
Registration date : 2008-09-28

To the west of the base is a 'no mans land', where NATO forces avoid and the Taliban are free to roam freely.

this is where they should be dropping bombs non-stop for about 2 weeks...shut down the zone completely.

Guest · 25 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Mon Jul 19, 2010 3:04 pm

Guest

This caught my sense of humour for some reason....

....are getting the full impact of foreign fighters coming in
for the summer fighting season.

Sponsored content

Latest topics

'An attack on Israel would be considered

1 'An attack on Israel would be considered Wed Feb 17, 2010 5:30 pm

rosencrentz

2 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Wed Feb 17, 2010 5:32 pm

rosencrentz

3 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Wed Feb 17, 2010 5:34 pm

Deank

4 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Wed Feb 17, 2010 5:42 pm

rosencrentz

5 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:04 pm

Guest

6 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:09 pm

Guest

7 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:09 pm

rosencrentz

8 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:11 pm

Guest

9 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:33 pm

rosencrentz

10 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Wed Feb 17, 2010 11:18 pm

Deank

11 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Wed Feb 17, 2010 11:23 pm

wpg_idiot

12 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:02 pm

rosencrentz

13 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:04 pm

Goth_chic

14 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:51 pm

Triniman

15 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Mon Jul 19, 2010 5:39 am

Freeman

16 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Mon Jul 19, 2010 7:51 am

rosencrentz

17 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Mon Jul 19, 2010 7:55 am

rosencrentz

18 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Mon Jul 19, 2010 9:14 am

Guest

19 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:02 am

grumpy old man

20 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:56 am

Guest

21 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:59 am

Deank

22 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Mon Jul 19, 2010 11:08 am

AGEsAces

23 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:41 pm

Deank

24 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:59 pm

AGEsAces

25 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered Mon Jul 19, 2010 3:04 pm

Guest

26 Re: 'An attack on Israel would be considered

Sponsored content