Our laws Don't Send The bad Guys Away For Long Enough

I couldn't find this thread, but I remember this topic.
This guy got 10 years for 3 rapes! How he couldn't be put away for life or 25 years is beyond my comprehension.
This S.O.B. got sentenced in 2005, today is 2009-. Our system is not putting these people away!
He was sentenced in November 2005 to three years in prison, in addition to the double-time equivalent of four-and-a-half years of time already served. His sentence expired in November 2008.

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/rapist-back-in-jail-over-drug-binge-job-in-strip-club-43687797.html

Thank God the time credit is being done away with .

I kinda' figure that if the Liberals were still in power, they would eventually have gotten us to the point where crooks would actually receive real "get out of jail" cards.

I figure at one point they would just start giving them money for each crime in the hopes that would "cure" them

It is not omly there fault it is and still is somewhat the constuition to blame for some of it . RIGHTS great thing that has taken on a life of its own . Defense lawyers love them greatest defense going .

In addition, we still must realize that some Canadians are fcuked in the head.

http://www.thestar.com/comment/article/624232

I've heard that the CBC is starting a new series called...
Welcome Back Khadr..

Agreed JTF. The issue with this a$$holes case is politics. Not repatriating some hard-done-by Canadian who made a small mistake while but a boy.

This "boy" killed a soldier during a terrorist action. He deserves no sympathy from Canadians that don't travel to another country with the sole purpose of participating in a war as a terrorist.

Take partisan politics out of the equation and the Layton's, Iggy's et al could care less. What a bunch of fricking hypocrites.

I wonder if the whiners who want to bring this guy back are in favour of a rights museum or not...I bet they are.

We could save a ton of money if we simply allowed Canadians to vote rather than put cases like this through our over-burned justice system. If millions can vote for Canadian Idol, why not just have the public vote on his innocence or guilt? The courts are ususally way too lenient anyway. Tons of cases could be voted on electronically without having to bring cases before a judge.

Right and next we can vote for the right to sleep or whatever , where doe's it stop .

Pavolo wrote:Right and next we can vote for the right to sleep or whatever , where doe's it stop .

Well, that's just plain silly. Voting in cases like Khadr's would work just fine because we have read all the facts necessary to draw an intelligent conclusion.

Bypass the courts. Save money.

Well, that's just plain silly. Voting in cases like Khadr's would work just fine because we have read all the facts necessary to draw an intelligent conclusion.

Bypass the courts. Save money.


You can not decide the law by voting it would never stand up in a court . The goverment has been given the power and we have to respect it . What next we decide foreign policy by vote .

"The goverment has been given the power and we have to respect it ."

WE means the judges need to respect it to.

"You can not decide the law by voting it would never stand up in a court
. The goverment has been given the power and we have to respect it .
What next we decide foreign policy by vote."

Then change the laws. Justice by popular opinion is definitely the way to go.

Man, 32, pleads guilty to sex assaults on girls





A MAN was released from jail Fri­day, just hours after pleading guilty in a Winnipeg courtroom to a string of crimes including down­loading child pornography and sexually assaulting two teenage girls.
Keith Robert Stuart, 32, is expected to immediately move to Brandon to re­sume living with a family member. He was sentenced to nine months of time served in custody, which was given two-for-one credit by provincial court Judge Theodore Lismer under a joint­recommendation from Crown and de­fence lawyers.
Stuart was also placed on three years of supervised probation with conditions including having no unsupervised con­tact with children under 16, abstaining from alcohol and attending sex-offender counselling. His name has been placed on the national sex-offender registry.
Defence lawyer Darren Sawchuk told court his client has struggled with drug and alcohol problems. He lost his job in the Alberta oilsands and become estranged from his partner and young child before moving to Manitoba.
Stuart's legal troubles began in April 2007 when a woman he was living with in St. Andrews went to RCMP after dis­covering child porn on their home com­puter.
Stuart admitted his guilt. The computer's hard drive revealed he'd visited several illicit websites.
"I was viewing it out of curiosity," Stuart told police.
Police released him on a promise to appear in court but re-arrested him weeks later in Selkirk after a 17-year­old girl filed a sexual assault complaint against him.
Stuart had gone to a house party, be­came intoxicated and then climbed into bed with the teen and fondled her, court was told. At the time, he was under court order to abstain from alcohol and not have contact with anyone under 18. Stuart spent several days in custody but was released a second time. His final arrest came last August in Bran­don, where Stuart had gone to live while subject to the same bail conditions. He went to another house party, got drunk and tried to molest a sleeping 16-year­old girl. He moved on to another room and fondled a second sleeping teen.
The victim's mother said she unaware of Stuart's pending criminal charges.
"You just feel so sick," she said, add­ing her daughter was devastated.
Sawchuk told court his client is ready for a fresh start after previously "put­ting himself in a position where it was inevitable" he was going to re-offend.
www.mikeoncrime.com