the winnipeg sandbox
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
the winnipeg sandbox

Latest topics

» Gord Steeves should run for Mayor
by FlyingRat Wed Aug 13, 2014 4:58 pm

» To discontinue?
by EdWin Sat Jul 12, 2014 9:26 pm

» Sandbox breakfast get-together, Saturday, January 25, 2014.
by rosencrentz Fri Apr 11, 2014 11:27 pm

» 2013-14 Bisons/CIS Thread
by Hollywood Tue Apr 01, 2014 11:56 pm

» Katz must resign
by cobragt Mon Oct 28, 2013 5:09 pm

» Best Breakfast/Brunch
by cobragt Mon Oct 28, 2013 5:07 pm

» Manitoba Action Party
by RogerStrong Mon Oct 21, 2013 2:24 pm

» Police Respond to a silent alarm With Guns Drawn
by EdWin Tue Aug 20, 2013 10:10 pm

» Details about Cineplex SuperTicket -- interesting promotion
by MattKel Thu Jul 18, 2013 4:08 pm

» Freep locks out non-subscriber commentary
by Deank Mon Jul 08, 2013 3:58 pm

» 7-year sentence for Berlusconi
by FlyingRat Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:32 pm

» New Stadium
by grumpy old man Mon May 27, 2013 4:34 pm

» Winnipeg News Android App
by grumpy old man Mon May 27, 2013 4:33 pm

» First Post
by grumpy old man Fri May 24, 2013 2:43 pm

» The New Sals at Pembina and Stafford
by grumpy old man Thu Apr 25, 2013 1:35 pm

» Emma Watson wants to do nude scenes for 50 shades of grey movie
by FlyingRat Wed Apr 24, 2013 10:39 am

» Museum finally admits it needs to raise more money priovately.
by FlyingRat Wed Apr 24, 2013 10:32 am

» And You Thought Your Taxes Are High Now!!!
by FlyingRat Wed Apr 24, 2013 10:21 am

» free chocolate sample
by cobragt Sun Mar 31, 2013 6:12 pm

» Do you want a gift certificate for A winnipeg restraunt?
by cobragt Sun Mar 31, 2013 6:12 pm


You are not connected. Please login or register

hydro tower

+4
Electrician
eastsider
grumpy old man
Mr_Point
8 posters

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 2]

1hydro tower Empty hydro tower Fri Apr 10, 2009 12:16 am

Mr_Point

Mr_Point
newbie

so the hydro tower aparently is 65% efficent not 60 quite the feat for a build its size

if anyone cares about this random tidbit thats made its way to me


hydro tower 3419634951_157724fda2

2hydro tower Empty Re: hydro tower Fri Apr 10, 2009 7:57 am

Guest

Anonymous
Guest

Yes it is quite the peice of work and shows that we can be better with this world . We have to people the status qou is not working never has .

3hydro tower Empty Re: hydro tower Fri Apr 10, 2009 8:21 am

grumpy old man

grumpy old man
administrator
administrator

Fixed it for ya pav...

Yes it is quite the piece of work and shows that we can be better with this world. We have to people, the status quo is not working, never has.

How efficient is an average new building? Any idea how Hydro achieved 65% efficiency? And what was the premium?

4hydro tower Empty Re: hydro tower Fri Apr 10, 2009 8:50 am

eastsider

eastsider
contributor plus
contributor plus

Grumpy, I imagine it cost millions and millions extra to be so efficient, makes you wonder when the break even point will be and this "efficiency" will actually start paying off.I know several construction guys that are working or have worked in the building, they were working with technology they had never tried before, it took so much extra time for them......almost a nightmare building to erect they claimed.

5hydro tower Empty Re: hydro tower Fri Apr 10, 2009 8:52 am

Guest

Anonymous
Guest

I believe this initial stage is somewhat misleading. As the newness of the building wears off and all the politicans stop coming for tours, the associated hot air loss will affect the numbers.

6hydro tower Empty Re: hydro tower Fri Apr 10, 2009 9:06 am

grumpy old man

grumpy old man
administrator
administrator

Good Post!

7hydro tower Empty Re: hydro tower Fri Apr 10, 2009 10:42 am

Electrician

Electrician
general-contributor
general-contributor

No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The Hydro Tower!!!
YOU GOTTA WAIT for the heavy downpours...
THEN you'll see the hydro efficiency soar way up there with drain piped water forcing the turbines to move and thus produce electricity.
sarcasm

http://www.new.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1416203996

8hydro tower Empty Re: hydro tower Fri Apr 10, 2009 10:55 am

Deank

Deank
contributor eminence
contributor eminence

well the "new" technology was tried in a number of different buildings and places around the city before hyrdo implemented them on such a huge scale. good for them 65% savings instead of 60..

9hydro tower Empty Re: hydro tower Fri Apr 10, 2009 11:53 am

cherenkov

cherenkov
contributor plus
contributor plus

It is quite the building: 1 point off LEED Platinum (would have been first in Canada) designation. They positioned the building to harness prevailing winds to assist air circulation in the building, it maximizes outside light, with minimal use of overhead lights (just personal desk lights when needed), double-layered glass walls, a water feature to control humidity, etc...

There is no way they would have built it like this, if they had their own way. But ... it's good to see I guess.

http://anybody-want-a-peanut.blogspot.com/

10hydro tower Empty Re: hydro tower Fri Apr 10, 2009 3:06 pm

FlyingRat

FlyingRat
moderator
moderator

Thanks Mr Point for the info and the great pic! Welcome to the sandbox!

11hydro tower Empty Re: hydro tower Fri Apr 10, 2009 3:34 pm

Mr_Point

Mr_Point
newbie

i had no idea u guys had wonderd off and started another one miz point mentioned something about dimsum meet might be there or not depends if i'm working or not but txs

as for office buildings most waste crazy amounts of energy

12hydro tower Empty Re: hydro tower Fri Apr 10, 2009 4:25 pm

FlyingRat

FlyingRat
moderator
moderator

cherenkov wrote:It is quite the building: 1 point off LEED Platinum (would have been first in Canada) designation. They positioned the building to harness prevailing winds to assist air circulation in the building, it maximizes outside light, with minimal use of overhead lights (just personal desk lights when needed), double-layered glass walls, a water feature to control humidity, etc...

There is no way they would have built it like this, if they had their own way. But ... it's good to see I guess.

Whaddaya mean "if they had their way"? Manitoba Hydro are the champions of power smart and high efficiency. It serves hydro well to be the shining example. I'm sure the overhead of all the extras will pay for themselves well before the useful life of the building, and that's just the monetary costs! The benefit to the environment starts day one!

Think green! green beer

13hydro tower Empty Re: hydro tower Fri Apr 10, 2009 4:30 pm

Guest

Anonymous
Guest

What was the 1 point screw-up about? Anyone?

14hydro tower Empty Re: hydro tower Fri Apr 10, 2009 4:34 pm

FlyingRat

FlyingRat
moderator
moderator

Probably because the tower wasn't located in Calgary! lol!

15hydro tower Empty Re: hydro tower Fri Apr 10, 2009 4:36 pm

FlyingRat

FlyingRat
moderator
moderator

Actually, here are the LEED levels:
Certified - 26-32 points
Silver - 33-38 points
Gold - 39-51 points
Platinum - 52-69 points

points are earning for the following:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leadership_in_Energy_and_Environmental_Design#Point_rating

So there are a number of things which could have been done to achieve the Platium, however, 51 points in nothing to sneeze at.

16hydro tower Empty Re: hydro tower Fri Apr 10, 2009 4:38 pm

Guest

Anonymous
Guest

These types of buildings are getting to be the norm elsewhere like Europe as the world is starting to think Green. Thanks Grumpy too early in the morning

17hydro tower Empty Re: hydro tower Fri Apr 10, 2009 5:44 pm

Mr_Point

Mr_Point
newbie

some of the stuff that gets points for leeds are purly stupid though and useles
but yea we should realy hammer the wrha for not going leeds on their new digs on main.....

18hydro tower Empty Re: hydro tower Sat Apr 11, 2009 8:48 am

Guest

Anonymous
Guest

They were going to but , not enough left for them too . After all Hydro is the example not the norm in goverment buildings.

19hydro tower Empty Re: hydro tower Sat Apr 11, 2009 9:03 am

Guest

Anonymous
Guest

Mr_Point wrote:some of the stuff that gets points for leeds are purly stupid though and useles
but yea we should realy hammer the wrha for not going leeds on their new digs on main.....

I suspect the reason they didn't was because for every LEEDS point, they were told they could hire 450 more administrative staff. Top level pay usually is affected by the number of your employees....connect the dots?

I LEEDS building will give you dick in terms of income, while staff on the other hand will make you bucks.

20hydro tower Empty Re: hydro tower Sat Apr 11, 2009 1:55 pm

cherenkov

cherenkov
contributor plus
contributor plus

FlyingRat wrote:Whaddaya mean "if they had their way"? Manitoba Hydro are the champions of power smart and high efficiency. It serves hydro well to be the shining example. I'm sure the overhead of all the extras will pay for themselves well before the useful life of the building, and that's just the monetary costs! The benefit to the environment starts day one!

Think green! green beer
From a cost/benefit point of view it probably doesn't make sense to build a super green office tower. In fact, it probably didn't make sense to build an office tower at all -- it was just part of the deal in purchasing Winnipeg Hydro. A private company maximizing profits probably would not have built that building.

http://anybody-want-a-peanut.blogspot.com/

21hydro tower Empty Re: hydro tower Sat Apr 11, 2009 10:49 pm

FlyingRat

FlyingRat
moderator
moderator

Why would it probably not make sense to build super green? I'm sure the costs and benefits were weighed... anyone got a source?

But in abstract terms, if you put down extra cash in the beginning of a project for reduced running costs over the long term, that extra cost is going to pay for itself at some point. They're going to get heating/cooling/lighting for a greatly reduced cost, especially when you consider that heating and cooling for standard buildings will generally increase over time.

I'm sure there will be a big press release on the day the green technology pays for itself.

22hydro tower Empty Re: hydro tower Mon Apr 13, 2009 9:45 am

AGEsAces

AGEsAces
moderator
moderator

Mr_Point wrote:some of the stuff that gets points for leeds are purly stupid though and useles
but yea we should realy hammer the wrha for not going leeds on their new digs on main.....

If the WRHA is funded by government...then ALL new construction is required to be LEED compliant.

There are several levels of LEED, though to get government funding, LEED Silver is all that's required.

http://www.photage.ca

23hydro tower Empty Re: hydro tower Mon Apr 13, 2009 4:48 pm

Mr_Point

Mr_Point
newbie

none of the ne wrha buildings are leed though

24hydro tower Empty Re: hydro tower Mon Apr 13, 2009 4:58 pm

AGEsAces

AGEsAces
moderator
moderator

Mr_Point wrote:none of the ne wrha buildings are leed though

Are the new (ground-up) construction? or renovation/addition?

Only new construction is REQUIRED to be LEED to get government funding.

http://www.photage.ca

25hydro tower Empty Re: hydro tower Mon Apr 13, 2009 5:00 pm

Mr_Point

Mr_Point
newbie

lets see...

their new hidious building on portage

and then theres their building on north main niether of them are leeds anything

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 2]

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum