Let me repeat:The Globe and Mail
The abortion debate is about to enter a "new era" of advocacy for the rights of the unborn, says a Conservative MP...The all-party caucus will publicize what it views as inadequate abotion regulation, and push for legislation to restrict abortions, Winnipeg MP Rod Bruinooge said in an interview....who recently took over the chairmanship of a secretive, parliamentary anti-abortion caucus.
"I was born in the post-Morgentaler era, and I think I come to this debate under a different context," Mr. Bruinooge said last night. "I believe that having open debate on important topics like this is essential for any democratic movement. It's a democracy, and we are putting our ideas out for debate."
Mr. Bruinooge declined to provide details about the membership of the caucus - which he described as "sizable" - on the basis that MPs from other parties fear internal repercussions if their activism is known. Click here to read entire column.
WTF? All government must be fully transparent. You want to lobby for new abortion rights do so in the open."who recently took over the chairmanship of a secretive, parliamentary anti-abortion caucus"
I don't anticipate this debate ever ending. I also respect the process. But what say we let the medical community decide when it is right and when it is wrong.
Let all engaged parties have their moment to provide their input. But let's give religion only a minor role in the debate.
Then write laws around those timelines and have this over with.
