the winnipeg sandbox
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
the winnipeg sandbox

Latest topics

» Gord Steeves should run for Mayor
by FlyingRat Wed Aug 13, 2014 4:58 pm

» To discontinue?
by EdWin Sat Jul 12, 2014 9:26 pm

» Sandbox breakfast get-together, Saturday, January 25, 2014.
by rosencrentz Fri Apr 11, 2014 11:27 pm

» 2013-14 Bisons/CIS Thread
by Hollywood Tue Apr 01, 2014 11:56 pm

» Katz must resign
by cobragt Mon Oct 28, 2013 5:09 pm

» Best Breakfast/Brunch
by cobragt Mon Oct 28, 2013 5:07 pm

» Manitoba Action Party
by RogerStrong Mon Oct 21, 2013 2:24 pm

» Police Respond to a silent alarm With Guns Drawn
by EdWin Tue Aug 20, 2013 10:10 pm

» Details about Cineplex SuperTicket -- interesting promotion
by MattKel Thu Jul 18, 2013 4:08 pm

» Freep locks out non-subscriber commentary
by Deank Mon Jul 08, 2013 3:58 pm

» 7-year sentence for Berlusconi
by FlyingRat Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:32 pm

» New Stadium
by grumpy old man Mon May 27, 2013 4:34 pm

» Winnipeg News Android App
by grumpy old man Mon May 27, 2013 4:33 pm

» First Post
by grumpy old man Fri May 24, 2013 2:43 pm

» The New Sals at Pembina and Stafford
by grumpy old man Thu Apr 25, 2013 1:35 pm

» Emma Watson wants to do nude scenes for 50 shades of grey movie
by FlyingRat Wed Apr 24, 2013 10:39 am

» Museum finally admits it needs to raise more money priovately.
by FlyingRat Wed Apr 24, 2013 10:32 am

» And You Thought Your Taxes Are High Now!!!
by FlyingRat Wed Apr 24, 2013 10:21 am

» free chocolate sample
by cobragt Sun Mar 31, 2013 6:12 pm

» Do you want a gift certificate for A winnipeg restraunt?
by cobragt Sun Mar 31, 2013 6:12 pm


You are not connected. Please login or register

anyone else for a downtown surface lot parking tax?

+5
AGEsAces
LivingDead
eViL tRoLl
JT Estoban
Deank
9 posters

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 2]

Deank

Deank
contributor eminence
contributor eminence

What about killing two birds with one stone? How about we clean up the multitude of surface parking lots AND gain some revenue for special projects?

$1 per day tax on surface parking lots, 10 cent per day tax on other parking stalls. Sure.. the companies will simply pass this on to the customers... who will hopefully vote with their feet and stay away from the surface level parking lots.

Use the money to fund more walkways. It would be awesome to be able to go from Red River Downtown to city hall, the museum all the way to Uof W and even the leg without having to go outside.

After that, use the money to help fund transit, bike initiatives. ( sure would be nice to have secure downtown storage for the average person biking)

JT Estoban

JT Estoban
major-contributor
major-contributor

Sure sounds like a neat idea... (anything to piss off Impark is A-OK in my books!)

But the lover affair with the automobile is still hot and heavy around these parts...and that's one tough nut to crack, just ask the mass transit folks about that one!

Deank

Deank
contributor eminence
contributor eminence

JT Estoban wrote:Sure sounds like a neat idea... (anything to piss off Impark is A-OK in my books!)

But the lover affair with the automobile is still hot and heavy around these parts...and that's one tough nut to crack, just ask the mass transit folks about that one!

true.. very true.. but perhaps the developers realize that they need to build a multi-use building parking structure with offices, or stores on top.. you know since it will be connected via walkway to so many people.


Look at the buildings behind portage place.. they are connected and the apartments and offices rarely sit vacant.

JT Estoban

JT Estoban
major-contributor
major-contributor

Your talking enclosed, above grade sky-walks? Or subterranean, like WPG Square tunnels?

If it's tunnels, a few already exist connecting various buildings. Mayhaps those could be incorporated into your idear.

eViL tRoLl

eViL tRoLl
contributor plus
contributor plus

Deank wrote:
$1 per day tax on surface parking lots, 10 cent per day tax on other parking stalls.
times ten ...

Guest

Anonymous
Guest

What would be the long term consequences of such a tax?

Would it change driving habits? I don't think so personally. It would just mean a bigger tax write-off I reckon.

LivingDead

LivingDead
general-contributor
general-contributor

Deank wrote:What about killing two birds with one stone? How about we clean up the multitude of surface parking lots AND gain some revenue for special projects?

$1 per day tax on surface parking lots, 10 cent per day tax on other parking stalls. Sure.. the companies will simply pass this on to the customers... who will hopefully vote with their feet and stay away from the surface level parking lots.

Use the money to fund more walkways. It would be awesome to be able to go from Red River Downtown to city hall, the museum all the way to Uof W and even the leg without having to go outside.

After that, use the money to help fund transit, bike initiatives. ( sure would be nice to have secure downtown storage for the average person biking)

I like that idea. Make it so.

http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare

Deank

Deank
contributor eminence
contributor eminence

JT Estoban wrote:Your talking enclosed, above grade sky-walks? Or subterranean, like WPG Square tunnels?

If it's tunnels, a few already exist connecting various buildings. Mayhaps those could be incorporated into your idear.

whatever works and makes it cheapest while still be accessible?

Deank

Deank
contributor eminence
contributor eminence

eViL tRoLl wrote:
Deank wrote:
$1 per day tax on surface parking lots, 10 cent per day tax on other parking stalls.
times ten ...

maybe not times 10... but maybe somewhere in between?

Deank

Deank
contributor eminence
contributor eminence

JTF wrote:What would be the long term consequences of such a tax?

Would it change driving habits? I don't think so personally. It would just mean a bigger tax write-off I reckon.

No real tax write off.
Change driving habits? Maybe.. in the long run, when many people start wanting to come and live downtown.

Guest

Anonymous
Guest

Ya right.

Perhaps in March, 2011. Smile

Deank

Deank
contributor eminence
contributor eminence

Oh I am talking real real long run. Something like that would take at least 5 years to start making an impact, more like 10to15 to start gathering steam.

AGEsAces

AGEsAces
moderator
moderator

Yes...tax write off...as many workers get either parking paid by their employer, or reimbursement, or get to write it off as having to pay to attend work.

Perhaps if it was tied in with some other incentive for corporate involvement?
Perhaps if more convenient and accessible (and secure) bicycle parking was available?
Perhaps if part of EVERY street-level parking area was REQUIRED to have a bicycle parking area?

http://www.photage.ca

Deank

Deank
contributor eminence
contributor eminence

"Perhaps if more convenient and accessible (and secure) bicycle parking was available?"

note the " sure would be nice to have secure downtown storage for the average person biking"

"or get to write it off as having to pay to attend work"

nope, not currently allowed as a charge in Canada, vehicle expenses yes, parking.. no.



also.. paying for someones parking (ie employer doing it) counts as income.

grumpy old man

grumpy old man
administrator
administrator

If the cost of parking downtown became too expensive would employers would stop subsidizing it?

A multi-faceted discovery is required. I guess the first thing to determine is what prevents business from setting up shop downtown? Most businesses that can set up anywhere (i.e. don't require local traffic to exist) must be choosing the burbs for reasons that downtown can't deliver.

Rental rates? Parking? Accessibility? Fear? Commute?

Can the city address these concerns to the point developers convert parking lots to buildings and business chooses downtown?

This is one of the areas I'd like a mayor to address when it comes to vision.

Deank

Deank
contributor eminence
contributor eminence

"Rental rates? Parking? Accessibility? Commute?"

Having worked downtown and now working where I do, and having talked to my boss about why we are out here ( and many other similar firms are as well) I have removed the one reason you added that was never a consideration. The rest stick.

Deank

Deank
contributor eminence
contributor eminence

"
Can the city address these concerns to the point developers convert parking lots to buildings and business chooses downtown?

"

its chicken and egg.

More development will happen downtown when there are more people downtown to fill the need, more people downtown will happen when there is more development downtown.

grumpy old man

grumpy old man
administrator
administrator

So then the answer is find a way to encourage greater density in Downtown Winnipeg?

This seems fairly straight-forward eh. First things first, eliminate the barriers to developers such as rent control. What other barriers need to be removed or eased?

Offer real incentives. Tax rebates. Tax holidays. Base the incentives on amenities offered such as enclosed parking, retail store fronts...

Again, a mayor with real vision should be able to drive this.

Freeman

Freeman
uber-contributor
uber-contributor

If you impose such a tax, would you end up with more downtown development or just more vacant parking stalls downtown?

grumpy old man

grumpy old man
administrator
administrator

Not following Freeman. What tax?

Freeman

Freeman
uber-contributor
uber-contributor

The Downtown Surface Lot Parking Tax. (DTSLPT for short)

Deank

Deank
contributor eminence
contributor eminence

Freeman wrote:If you impose such a tax, would you end up with more downtown development or just more vacant parking stalls downtown?

companies dont hold onto land that is costing them money every year.

ooo did I not mention the derelict land bylaws?

grumpy old man

grumpy old man
administrator
administrator

I think the rationale behind such a tax is make it too expensive to park leading to a parking lot that is less profitable.

Freeman

Freeman
uber-contributor
uber-contributor

Deank wrote:
Freeman wrote:If you impose such a tax, would you end up with more downtown development or just more vacant parking stalls downtown?

companies dont hold onto land that is costing them money every year.

ooo did I not mention the derelict land bylaws?

...as a matter of fact, you didn't, please go on..

grumpy old man

grumpy old man
administrator
administrator

The city could impose a number of regulations that would either drive the parking lots out of business or ensure the land is not a sea of concrete.

For example "x" trees per "x" cars. Park benches every 20' on the entire perimeter. Minimum lighting. Manned booths...

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 2]

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum