Last edited by LennyJessop on Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:18 pm; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : fear of GOM)
Last edited by LennyJessop on Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:18 pm; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : fear of GOM)
JTF wrote:He / Dorchester want the government to pay for his facilities after the fact.
He should have been involving the government before he opened up this type of business.
Last edited by LennyJessop on Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:19 pm; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : fear)
Last edited by LennyJessop on Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:19 pm; edited 1 time in total
LennyJessop wrote:Freeman wrote:Is there another connection between Winpark Dorchester, other than the guy works there?
The Rabb guy owns Winpark Dorchester along with his brother, and runs 3 sober living homes. The problem is he claims he cannot afford to pay for 2 additional staff members, yet he opened up 2 new sober homes in 2009. Something isn't right. Going by logic, if you cannot afford to maintain one home (he has been claiming for 18 months), why open up 2 others a few months ago?
Well technically his brother is the owner, I'm not sure is he co-owns the company or just works for his brother.Freeman wrote:LennyJessop wrote:Freeman wrote:Is there another connection between Winpark Dorchester, other than the guy works there?
The Rabb guy owns Winpark Dorchester along with his brother, and runs 3 sober living homes. The problem is he claims he cannot afford to pay for 2 additional staff members, yet he opened up 2 new sober homes in 2009. Something isn't right. Going by logic, if you cannot afford to maintain one home (he has been claiming for 18 months), why open up 2 others a few months ago?
the article refers to him as the General Manager, is it true that he is actually an owner of Winpark Dorchester?
Last edited by LennyJessop on Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:20 pm; edited 1 time in total
Last edited by LennyJessop on Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:20 pm; edited 1 time in total
Last edited by LennyJessop on Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:20 pm; edited 1 time in total
LennyJessop wrote:All I can say about this is I know a lot more about this situation that I am prepared to mention. Let's just say I know this individual, and don't think much of him....
I fear an agenda behind these posts.LennyJessop wrote:3. Hypothetically speaking, suppose the owner of a sober living house routinely goes on clothing spending sprees for Ed Harvey brand name clothing, sometimes dropping $800-900 at one sitting, while claiming to be in financial peril, what would you make of it?
Last edited by JTF on Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm; edited 1 time in total
JTF wrote:I doubt that all the houses together from Portage to Westminister are worth that much.
Seems to me that this guy is blowing smoke outta his ass and the 'reporter' is inhaling heavily.
grumpy old man wrote:I fear an agenda behind these posts.
What exactly is your concern? Is something illegal going on? Is something immoral going on?
Maybe I'm thick. What am I missing?
rosencrentz wrote:I notice that it is a not-for-profit residence for $300-$495 per month per room. The houses look pretty nice, and I wonder if this is an off shoot of the rental or real estate company that took old clunker homes and converted them into a very good idea for helping out addicts?
A non - profit agency has some very stringent operating regulations! I don't know what these rules have in regards to drawing salaries, but I would think that financial statements are public knowledge.
Go to page : 1, 2
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|