If we are going that far, the bus driver's should not have the body armour but consideration should be looked at for shields similar to those in the taxi cabs here in Winnipeg.
If you were a front line service worker dealing with the most dangerous and often unpredictable people in this city and are being paid by the City of Winnipeg then I would think that your employer would want you to be protected. It costs a lot less to protect your employees than to pay out disablility/death benefits and then retrain new employees if "accidents" happen on the job.
Realizing this may be a far fetched exaggeration but I would think that if it were you on the front line Dean, you and your spouse and children would want you as safe as you could possibly be. In this ever increasingly violent society we live in, where criminals can go to the corner and buy a gun for $20.00, why shouldn't we protect those who are meant to protect us from harm?
If you were a front line service worker dealing with the most dangerous and often unpredictable people in this city and are being paid by the City of Winnipeg then I would think that your employer would want you to be protected. It costs a lot less to protect your employees than to pay out disablility/death benefits and then retrain new employees if "accidents" happen on the job.
Realizing this may be a far fetched exaggeration but I would think that if it were you on the front line Dean, you and your spouse and children would want you as safe as you could possibly be. In this ever increasingly violent society we live in, where criminals can go to the corner and buy a gun for $20.00, why shouldn't we protect those who are meant to protect us from harm?