I sincerely doubt that. EdWin is merely confused over who was striking.Deank wrote:wait a minute they are called Engineers and they dont even have a high school education?
the winnipeg sandbox
I sincerely doubt that. EdWin is merely confused over who was striking.Deank wrote:wait a minute they are called Engineers and they dont even have a high school education?
grumpy old man wrote:I sincerely doubt that. EdWin is merely confused over who was striking.Deank wrote:wait a minute they are called Engineers and they dont even have a high school education?
Freeman wrote:How can any strike be "needed"? 340 workers force the lay off of thousands, up to 12,000 daily passengers inconvenienced, considering the current state of the economy. how is that "needed"? This is a highly unionized environment, how can the conditions deteriorate so badly?
That remains to be seen. They've merely agreed to arbitration. They will likely end up with a contract. But maybe not what they wanted to begin with. A recession is a really poor time to be striking. Especially when striking a heavily taxpayer subsidized crown corporation...Not_Too_Slow wrote:It worked... didn't it?
JTF wrote:I've heard that one of the things the employees wanted was to be able to have two days off in a row....something they have been unable to receive for some reason.
EdWin wrote:When you cut back staff to a point where they are doing 5 different jobs at once, running around the train to try and keep pace while dealing with general passenger needs at the same time, barely getting 5 hours of sleep at night, and layovers consisting of 5 hours in a hotel in Vancouver (where again, this time includes getting off the train, eating a meal, sleeping, getting back to the train and starting work), things are sh1t for the workers. They've cut back and cut back so much over the years that the moral of the workers is horrible; so many of them hate their job and have no motivation to care about quality service, and after seeing what they put up with, I don't blame them.
This is why a strike was "needed"; to bring to attention the sh1t working conditions. I just hope most of the demands were met, and that more federal funding is needed or privatize the system to make it more economically efficient.
Bartron wrote:EdWin wrote:When you cut back staff to a point where they are doing 5 different jobs at once, running around the train to try and keep pace while dealing with general passenger needs at the same time, barely getting 5 hours of sleep at night, and layovers consisting of 5 hours in a hotel in Vancouver (where again, this time includes getting off the train, eating a meal, sleeping, getting back to the train and starting work), things are sh1t for the workers. They've cut back and cut back so much over the years that the moral of the workers is horrible; so many of them hate their job and have no motivation to care about quality service, and after seeing what they put up with, I don't blame them.
This is why a strike was "needed"; to bring to attention the sh1t working conditions. I just hope most of the demands were met, and that more federal funding is needed or privatize the system to make it more economically efficient.
The whole 5 hour sleep and layover thing is just how the industry works. It's the same for conductors and engineers in freight. I'm sure they knew full well that thoses were the conditions of the job before becoming engineers, because they probably started as conductors.
P.S, You need a high school diploma to work on the railroad now!
grumpy old man wrote:But if that is true EdWin perhaps they should be grateful that patronage can get them a job they don't qualify for and on the taxpayers dime. Grateful = no strike...
LEts see how the binding arbitration settles out. And I guess if you're one of the 340 compared to the thousands of others put out by the strike, then I guess you might think it worked.Not_Too_Slow wrote:Freeman wrote:How can any strike be "needed"? 340 workers force the lay off of thousands, up to 12,000 daily passengers inconvenienced, considering the current state of the economy. how is that "needed"? This is a highly unionized environment, how can the conditions deteriorate so badly?
It worked... didn't it?
Freeman wrote:LEts see how the binding arbitration settles out. And I guess if you're one of the 340 compared to the thousands of others put out by the strike, then I guess you might think it worked.Not_Too_Slow wrote:Freeman wrote:How can any strike be "needed"? 340 workers force the lay off of thousands, up to 12,000 daily passengers inconvenienced, considering the current state of the economy. how is that "needed"? This is a highly unionized environment, how can the conditions deteriorate so badly?
It worked... didn't it?
Freeman wrote:I know the feeling, its called vacation.
Good catch. Moved as suggested...EdWin wrote:BTW, shouldn't this be in the national section?
Go to page : 1, 2
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|