the winnipeg sandbox
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
the winnipeg sandbox

Latest topics

» Gord Steeves should run for Mayor
by FlyingRat Wed Aug 13, 2014 4:58 pm

» To discontinue?
by EdWin Sat Jul 12, 2014 9:26 pm

» Sandbox breakfast get-together, Saturday, January 25, 2014.
by rosencrentz Fri Apr 11, 2014 11:27 pm

» 2013-14 Bisons/CIS Thread
by Hollywood Tue Apr 01, 2014 11:56 pm

» Katz must resign
by cobragt Mon Oct 28, 2013 5:09 pm

» Best Breakfast/Brunch
by cobragt Mon Oct 28, 2013 5:07 pm

» Manitoba Action Party
by RogerStrong Mon Oct 21, 2013 2:24 pm

» Police Respond to a silent alarm With Guns Drawn
by EdWin Tue Aug 20, 2013 10:10 pm

» Details about Cineplex SuperTicket -- interesting promotion
by MattKel Thu Jul 18, 2013 4:08 pm

» Freep locks out non-subscriber commentary
by Deank Mon Jul 08, 2013 3:58 pm

» 7-year sentence for Berlusconi
by FlyingRat Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:32 pm

» New Stadium
by grumpy old man Mon May 27, 2013 4:34 pm

» Winnipeg News Android App
by grumpy old man Mon May 27, 2013 4:33 pm

» First Post
by grumpy old man Fri May 24, 2013 2:43 pm

» The New Sals at Pembina and Stafford
by grumpy old man Thu Apr 25, 2013 1:35 pm

» Emma Watson wants to do nude scenes for 50 shades of grey movie
by FlyingRat Wed Apr 24, 2013 10:39 am

» Museum finally admits it needs to raise more money priovately.
by FlyingRat Wed Apr 24, 2013 10:32 am

» And You Thought Your Taxes Are High Now!!!
by FlyingRat Wed Apr 24, 2013 10:21 am

» free chocolate sample
by cobragt Sun Mar 31, 2013 6:12 pm

» Do you want a gift certificate for A winnipeg restraunt?
by cobragt Sun Mar 31, 2013 6:12 pm


You are not connected. Please login or register

Heritage Status removed.

+4
grumpy old man
AGEsAces
St Norberter
Deank
8 posters

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 2]

1Heritage Status removed. Empty Heritage Status removed. Tue Jun 02, 2009 2:01 pm

Deank

Deank
contributor eminence
contributor eminence

This is ridiculous.

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/Century-old-home-on-Roslyn-stripped-of-heritage-status-46727252.html

A building successfully gets heritage status, only to have it taken away when a new council comes into play.

2Heritage Status removed. Empty Re: Heritage Status removed. Tue Jun 02, 2009 2:11 pm

St Norberter

St Norberter
major-contributor
major-contributor

Deank wrote:This is ridiculous.

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/Century-old-home-on-Roslyn-stripped-of-heritage-status-46727252.html

A building successfully gets heritage status, only to have it taken away when a new council comes into play.

When a new council comes into play? The building got heritage status in 1984! Mayors since then - Norrie, Thompson, Murray, Katz.

I wouldn't put this on a new council.

Bets on how long before Jenny starts screeching about this?

http://bgilchrist.wordpress.com/

3Heritage Status removed. Empty Re: Heritage Status removed. Tue Jun 02, 2009 2:16 pm

AGEsAces

AGEsAces
moderator
moderator

Heritage Status...what does that mean?

Does that mean that some old decrepit building which should've been torn down decades ago gets "protected" from demolition because some whining over-emotional nincompoop can't accept moving forward in time and building new, functional, and more usable buildings in its place?

Is it one which despite not owning the building, some idiot has stepped up and declared the building somehow "important" and should therefore not be torn down, even if the OWNER of the building is trying to?

Or have I missed the mark on that one?

http://www.photage.ca

4Heritage Status removed. Empty Re: Heritage Status removed. Tue Jun 02, 2009 2:28 pm

Deank

Deank
contributor eminence
contributor eminence

nope thats about it.

5Heritage Status removed. Empty Re: Heritage Status removed. Tue Jun 02, 2009 2:29 pm

Deank

Deank
contributor eminence
contributor eminence

St Norberter wrote:
Deank wrote:This is ridiculous.

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/Century-old-home-on-Roslyn-stripped-of-heritage-status-46727252.html

A building successfully gets heritage status, only to have it taken away when a new council comes into play.

When a new council comes into play? The building got heritage status in 1984! Mayors since then - Norrie, Thompson, Murray, Katz.

I wouldn't put this on a new council.

Bets on how long before Jenny starts screeching about this?

you realize we have a new council ( well close to half a new council anyway) since 1984 right?

6Heritage Status removed. Empty Re: Heritage Status removed. Tue Jun 02, 2009 2:31 pm

grumpy old man

grumpy old man
administrator
administrator

It should be stripped of that status.

Nothing will ever get built in this city. And you wonder why there is such sprawl in this city. Put up barrier after barrier after barrier to any and all infill construction and ye will reap what ye sow...

Who was fighting this? Friends of 166 Roslyn?

7Heritage Status removed. Empty Re: Heritage Status removed. Tue Jun 02, 2009 2:37 pm

Deank

Deank
contributor eminence
contributor eminence

It should either have never had status in the first place or it should have kept its status.

We need an evaluation of all our historical buildings and we need to set them all going foward. No more suprises for developers or local residents. Get it done and leave it done.

8Heritage Status removed. Empty Re: Heritage Status removed. Tue Jun 02, 2009 2:45 pm

St Norberter

St Norberter
major-contributor
major-contributor

Deank wrote:
St Norberter wrote:
Deank wrote:This is ridiculous.

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/Century-old-home-on-Roslyn-stripped-of-heritage-status-46727252.html

A building successfully gets heritage status, only to have it taken away when a new council comes into play.

When a new council comes into play? The building got heritage status in 1984! Mayors since then - Norrie, Thompson, Murray, Katz.

I wouldn't put this on a new council.

Bets on how long before Jenny starts screeching about this?

you realize we have a new council ( well close to half a new council anyway) since 1984 right?

We've had several new councils since 1984. Your post sounded like the only reason it was being demolished was that there was a change in the council ( i.e. the council that had given it the historical designation in 1984 had recently been replaced by a new council.)

http://bgilchrist.wordpress.com/

9Heritage Status removed. Empty Re: Heritage Status removed. Tue Jun 02, 2009 2:51 pm

Deank

Deank
contributor eminence
contributor eminence

I would assume that if we had the exact same council as we did in 1984 that it would not have even been entertained to remove the status.

10Heritage Status removed. Empty Re: Heritage Status removed. Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:06 pm

grumpy old man

grumpy old man
administrator
administrator

This is what you said.

Deank wrote:A building successfully gets heritage status, only to have it taken away when a new council comes into play.

I understood you to mean precisely the same thing as St Norberter.

Let me guess. You post so much here you believe we are to understand what you mean to say??? Smile

11Heritage Status removed. Empty Re: Heritage Status removed. Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:07 pm

Deank

Deank
contributor eminence
contributor eminence

you guys mean you cant actually read my mind and I need to start posting full and complete sentences? frick that sh...

12Heritage Status removed. Empty Re: Heritage Status removed. Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:13 pm

grumpy old man

grumpy old man
administrator
administrator

Yup. Full and complete sentences AND perfect grammar.

13Heritage Status removed. Empty Re: Heritage Status removed. Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:15 pm

Deank

Deank
contributor eminence
contributor eminence

heh, jsut for that demand I am going to start deleting every third or 4th word from my posts starting right after this post.

14Heritage Status removed. Empty Re: Heritage Status removed. Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:19 pm

grumpy old man

grumpy old man
administrator
administrator

WTF? Then your posts will look just like Pavolo's! I forbid this...

15Heritage Status removed. Empty Re: Heritage Status removed. Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:26 pm

Deank

Deank
contributor eminence
contributor eminence

LO just try to me

16Heritage Status removed. Empty Re: Heritage Status removed. Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:46 pm

winnipegceilingcat

winnipegceilingcat
newbie

so help me to understand this.. they are going to destroy, what appears to be a beautiful home in the village for an apartment complex.. BUT they won't demo an old wooden wall that most people didn't even know existed for the exact same reason.

some times i just don't get this city.

17Heritage Status removed. Empty Re: Heritage Status removed. Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:59 pm

grumpy old man

grumpy old man
administrator
administrator

What old wooden wall do you refer to?

18Heritage Status removed. Empty Re: Heritage Status removed. Tue Jun 02, 2009 9:48 pm

EdWin

EdWin
major-contributor
major-contributor

grumpy old man wrote:
Who was fighting this? Friends of 166 Roslyn?

With friends like these, who needs enemies?

Winnipeg has way too many of these enemies...er...friends, and some of these people need to be silenced.

19Heritage Status removed. Empty Re: Heritage Status removed. Wed Jun 03, 2009 7:10 am

Guest

Anonymous
Guest

I believe the fort grumpy but it has history, this house in the village is just another old house of someone no one knows cept when you go there .

20Heritage Status removed. Empty Re: Heritage Status removed. Wed Jun 03, 2009 7:38 am

rosencrentz

rosencrentz
uber-contributor
uber-contributor

You forget that if they demolish this house and build something new with more people living their , that the streets may get more traffic and cause the streets to decay! And the extra noise, don't forget that! And the extra trafic will cause more global warming, and we all know that it is way two friggin hot in Winnipeg!

http://www.elansofas.com

21Heritage Status removed. Empty Re: Heritage Status removed. Wed Jun 03, 2009 7:45 am

Guest

Anonymous
Guest

Ain't progress grand .

22Heritage Status removed. Empty Re: Heritage Status removed. Wed Jun 03, 2009 7:57 am

Guest

Anonymous
Guest

grumpy old man wrote:It should be stripped of that status.

Nothing will ever get built in this city. And you wonder why there is such sprawl in this city. Put up barrier after barrier after barrier to any and all infill construction and ye will reap what ye sow...

Who was fighting this? Friends of 166 Roslyn?

I agree 100%

BTW, do you know the status of what is going on with 166 Roslyn?

23Heritage Status removed. Empty Re: Heritage Status removed. Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:06 am

grumpy old man

grumpy old man
administrator
administrator

If it passes executive council (?) it will be torn down.

24Heritage Status removed. Empty Re: Heritage Status removed. Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:15 am

Guest

Anonymous
Guest

I think it passed executive 'committee' and now goes to council for a vote.

25Heritage Status removed. Empty Re: Heritage Status removed. Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:50 am

Freeman

Freeman
uber-contributor
uber-contributor

I'm tired of this crap with all these "historical" or "heritage" buildings. HOw many old dilapidated buildings do we need in this City? Why would anyone want to buy one of these gems, when the cost of making it habitable is consdierably greater than the cost of new construction/

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 2]

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum