#3. If He Has a Bigger johnson, He Is More Likely to Be GayWe
have previously mentioned that finger length ratio and the direction of a person's hair swirl
were good indicators of whether someone was more likely to be gay. The
problem with those measurements is that they're pretty hard to get
without posing as a manicurist-slash-barber. Plus, if you're getting
that intimate with another man's fingers and scalp, you're probably
already pretty certain of which way the pendulum swings.
Photos.com
"Titties might not be my thing."The good news is that we've got another measurement that's a little
easier to spot from distance, and is, statistically speaking, a decent
indication of sexuality. The bad news is that, well, you'll see.
How? Tell Me!
It's dick size. Gay men usually have bigger dicks. So, this is probably one you'll have to try in the locker room.
Photos.com
"You know, it never occurred to me until I was staring at your bare johnson, but ..."This was a massive study, by the way. Between 1938 and 1963, the
Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender and Reproduction conducted
the study on 5,122 men. First, the guys were put into two groups,
straight and gay. Then the men measured their junk in five different
ways.
On all five counts, gay men reported larger penises than heterosexual men.
That's right, guys. Length, circumference, the whole sha-wang. When
erect, a gay man's johnson is an average of 1/3 of an inch longer than a
straight guy's. It's also chubbier. Perhaps even more interestingly,
massive gay junk seems to be
skewing the overall average johnson length up to 6 inches, while the average straight man's is actually just a fraction shorter than that.
And let's not even get on the subject of balls. The only thing is, no one was actually taking a tape measure to the
test subjects' boners (they were measuring themselves), so we don't know
if the numbers were 100 percent accurate. But current researchers say
that there is no reason to believe gay guys would exaggerate their
numbers more than straight guys. So while the numbers might be inflated
overall, the discrepancy is almost certainly still legitimate.