the winnipeg sandbox
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
the winnipeg sandbox

Latest topics

» Gord Steeves should run for Mayor
by FlyingRat Wed Aug 13, 2014 4:58 pm

» To discontinue?
by EdWin Sat Jul 12, 2014 9:26 pm

» Sandbox breakfast get-together, Saturday, January 25, 2014.
by rosencrentz Fri Apr 11, 2014 11:27 pm

» 2013-14 Bisons/CIS Thread
by Hollywood Tue Apr 01, 2014 11:56 pm

» Katz must resign
by cobragt Mon Oct 28, 2013 5:09 pm

» Best Breakfast/Brunch
by cobragt Mon Oct 28, 2013 5:07 pm

» Manitoba Action Party
by RogerStrong Mon Oct 21, 2013 2:24 pm

» Police Respond to a silent alarm With Guns Drawn
by EdWin Tue Aug 20, 2013 10:10 pm

» Details about Cineplex SuperTicket -- interesting promotion
by MattKel Thu Jul 18, 2013 4:08 pm

» Freep locks out non-subscriber commentary
by Deank Mon Jul 08, 2013 3:58 pm

» 7-year sentence for Berlusconi
by FlyingRat Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:32 pm

» New Stadium
by grumpy old man Mon May 27, 2013 4:34 pm

» Winnipeg News Android App
by grumpy old man Mon May 27, 2013 4:33 pm

» First Post
by grumpy old man Fri May 24, 2013 2:43 pm

» The New Sals at Pembina and Stafford
by grumpy old man Thu Apr 25, 2013 1:35 pm

» Emma Watson wants to do nude scenes for 50 shades of grey movie
by FlyingRat Wed Apr 24, 2013 10:39 am

» Museum finally admits it needs to raise more money priovately.
by FlyingRat Wed Apr 24, 2013 10:32 am

» And You Thought Your Taxes Are High Now!!!
by FlyingRat Wed Apr 24, 2013 10:21 am

» free chocolate sample
by cobragt Sun Mar 31, 2013 6:12 pm

» Do you want a gift certificate for A winnipeg restraunt?
by cobragt Sun Mar 31, 2013 6:12 pm


You are not connected. Please login or register

Has Common Sense Finally Appeared on the Political Horizon?

+3
Miz point
Deank
grumpy old man
7 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

grumpy old man

grumpy old man
administrator
administrator

It certainly appears so...

A Tory government might become one that throws youth criminals into wilderness camps, strives to make Manitoba a "have" province and sends the controversial BiPole III hydro-electric transmission line down Lake Winnipeg's east side -- saving the public purse as much as $640 million with a shortened route.

Those moves became possible yesterday when delegates at the Progressive Conservative party's annual general meeting put them among 40 resolutions to be considered by the party's caucus, to possibly become part of its 2011 election platform.

"We'll be heavily influenced by what the party grassroots have advised us on," Leader Hugh McFadyen said of the resolutions adopted among nearly 90 possible choices.

WILDERNESS CAMP

The wilderness camp idea, he said, will be examined as a way to deal more harshly with juvenile offenders "with a view to getting kids out of the city and into a more structured environment with a hope that they can be rehabilitated" and turn themselves around.

With issues ranging from crime and the environment to job creation and health care, the adopted resolutions include making Manitoba a more prosperous "have" jurisdiction by doing more to encourage investment and business creation and, McFadyen added, "getting rid of some of the red tape and high taxes" that curb such growth.

"The way out of this is to grow our way out of the recession," he said, "instead of having the government spend our way out."

By ROSS ROMANIUK, SUN MEDIA

Deank

Deank
contributor eminence
contributor eminence

common sense would be getting rid of the leader of that party so they have a hope of winning

Guest

Anonymous
Guest

Hughie may not look as wimpy now that Gary is out of the scene. Premier Sellajerk looks just as wimpy imho, so it may get down to a slap-fight next election. Wink

Miz point

Miz point
uber-contributor
uber-contributor

I don't think it is a question of ousting McFayden as much as it's beefing up his presence in terms of getting him out there more to immediately respond to the press everytime Selinger makes a new announcement. McFayden's communications team is new and are in the process of building up his presence. He has been touring rural areas a great deal lately and as those areas are traditionally PC strongholds for the most part he can perhaps test his platforms better in a more sympatico environment?

http://www.granhotelflores.blogspot.com

rosencrentz

rosencrentz
uber-contributor
uber-contributor

For the Conservatives to win , 90,000 voting poor people have to be sent to Saskatchewan and all the aboriginals as well!
Why would we expect the NDP to fail?
List anything that they have brought in as Law that offends you!

http://www.elansofas.com

Guest

Anonymous
Guest

Paying the unions millions of dollars to NOT strike during work on Duff's Ditch offends me greatly.

umcrouc0

umcrouc0
contributor plus
contributor plus

Not sure if they necessarily need to get rid of Hugh but definitely need to start selling themselves as people with good alternative plans. The majority of people aren't mad enough at the government to vote the Conservatives in just because they aren't the NDP. If they could put together a really strong platform they could have a shot but it won't be easy.

For things like the BiPole III they need to be able to show that going down the East side won't just wind up taking years longer with it tied up in negotiations with First Nations communities on the land. Otherwise all the NDP would need to do to shoot the idea down is point to how much time and money it took to get the Wuskwatim dam agreement together and weigh that against the additional costs for the West side development. But if they Conservatives can show that their plan is actually better, and not just the plan that the NDP didn't go with, it could get them some support.

usedtoliveinstb

usedtoliveinstb
newbie

JTF wrote:Paying the unions millions of dollars to NOT strike during work on Duff's Ditch offends me greatly.

That's exactly what FDR did to enable the yanks to win WWII. Sometimes, when a project needs to get done, you just need to pay a premium to get it done on time.

Guest

Anonymous
Guest

Yes they may have negotiate with First nations but the long term savings and betterment to all.s lives are worth it going the east side. This is one of the dumbest decisions made by Gary .

Guest

Anonymous
Guest

JTF wrote:Paying the unions millions of dollars to NOT strike during work on Duff's Ditch offends me greatly.
Giving them none of the blame in Crocus offended me more . Doer will make a good ambassador but he was wrong to kiss the unions ass as often as he did Has Common Sense Finally Appeared on the Political Horizon? Icon_rolleyes

rosencrentz

rosencrentz
uber-contributor
uber-contributor

agreeing to spend an extra $600 million dollars to run some hydro poles an extra 27 million miles away from the source of the power, to cut the aboriginal claims down to nothing!

http://www.elansofas.com

umcrouc0

umcrouc0
contributor plus
contributor plus

Pavolo wrote:Yes they may have negotiate with First nations but the long term savings and betterment to all.s lives are worth it going the east side. This is one of the dumbest decisions made by Gary .

Could be. Depends on the terms of the agreement and the amount of time it would take to come up with it. Pushing the project back means lost revenue and I don't know how much would need to be paid per year to use the land or what other concessions would be needed. Maybe it is a really bad move to go the way they did, but it's not a short or cheap task to go into negotiations of this type.

usedtoliveinstb

usedtoliveinstb
newbie

umcrouc0 wrote:
Pavolo wrote:Yes they may have negotiate with First nations but the long term savings and betterment to all.s lives are worth it going the east side. This is one of the dumbest decisions made by Gary .

Could be. Depends on the terms of the agreement and the amount of time it would take to come up with it. Pushing the project back means lost revenue and I don't know how much would need to be paid per year to use the land or what other concessions would be needed. Maybe it is a really bad move to go the way they did, but it's not a short or cheap task to go into negotiations of this type.

The risk of building on the East side on "native land" is probably greater than the small additional cost of building West. It's not as simple as inital cost, you also must calculate for what happens when some court determines that the "reserves own the power that goes through their lands". Billion dollar settlement time?

LivingDead

LivingDead
general-contributor
general-contributor

usedtoliveinstb wrote:
umcrouc0 wrote:
Pavolo wrote:Yes they may have negotiate with First nations but the long term savings and betterment to all.s lives are worth it going the east side. This is one of the dumbest decisions made by Gary .

Could be. Depends on the terms of the agreement and the amount of time it would take to come up with it. Pushing the project back means lost revenue and I don't know how much would need to be paid per year to use the land or what other concessions would be needed. Maybe it is a really bad move to go the way they did, but it's not a short or cheap task to go into negotiations of this type.

The risk of building on the East side on "native land" is probably greater than the small additional cost of building West. It's not as simple as inital cost, you also must calculate for what happens when some court determines that the "reserves own the power that goes through their lands". Billion dollar settlement time?

The risk of Accidental Nuclear War and its subsequent Nuclear Winter is a bigger risk facing Humans.

http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare

Guest

Anonymous
Guest

The risk of Accidental Nuclear War and its subsequent Nuclear Winter is a bigger risk facing Humans.

While the consequences are certainly much greater, I think the probability is far less than the natives disrupting the power grid, and the consequences could be as devastating for many of us living in this climate.

In the opinion of many, the best way to go is right down the middle of the lake, but unfortunately, the decision will be political and not at all logical or correct.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum