I don't know of any companies that make employees pay for business lunches. It's expected that they would have lots of working lunches and that they would go to places close to city hall. If you want them to drive to somewhere out of the area to get a 'cheaper' lunch we'll just be spending more on the travel time than what's saved on food.
Wow, big news, councilors go for lunch near work. Better than them driving across town and wasting half a day's worth of wages than spending an extra $20 on food. About $1850 at Kum-Koon (great food BTW) in 43 trips works out to about $43 dollars per trip. Assuming they would often be picking up the tab of the person they are eating with that's pretty damn good. And with wages and benefits probably costs us less than half an hour of their time. Get them to spend and extra 20 minutes driving to save $20 and with the return trip we're probably about $40 more in the hole. I don't know what the overhead and benefits work out to so it's more realistically probably around $80 that we'd be down. When I saw the headline I thought it would be something like $20K per councillor on meal expense claims. This is nothing.
Wow, big news, councilors go for lunch near work. Better than them driving across town and wasting half a day's worth of wages than spending an extra $20 on food. About $1850 at Kum-Koon (great food BTW) in 43 trips works out to about $43 dollars per trip. Assuming they would often be picking up the tab of the person they are eating with that's pretty damn good. And with wages and benefits probably costs us less than half an hour of their time. Get them to spend and extra 20 minutes driving to save $20 and with the return trip we're probably about $40 more in the hole. I don't know what the overhead and benefits work out to so it's more realistically probably around $80 that we'd be down. When I saw the headline I thought it would be something like $20K per councillor on meal expense claims. This is nothing.