the winnipeg sandbox
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
the winnipeg sandbox

Latest topics

» Gord Steeves should run for Mayor
by FlyingRat Wed Aug 13, 2014 4:58 pm

» To discontinue?
by EdWin Sat Jul 12, 2014 9:26 pm

» Sandbox breakfast get-together, Saturday, January 25, 2014.
by rosencrentz Fri Apr 11, 2014 11:27 pm

» 2013-14 Bisons/CIS Thread
by Hollywood Tue Apr 01, 2014 11:56 pm

» Katz must resign
by cobragt Mon Oct 28, 2013 5:09 pm

» Best Breakfast/Brunch
by cobragt Mon Oct 28, 2013 5:07 pm

» Manitoba Action Party
by RogerStrong Mon Oct 21, 2013 2:24 pm

» Police Respond to a silent alarm With Guns Drawn
by EdWin Tue Aug 20, 2013 10:10 pm

» Details about Cineplex SuperTicket -- interesting promotion
by MattKel Thu Jul 18, 2013 4:08 pm

» Freep locks out non-subscriber commentary
by Deank Mon Jul 08, 2013 3:58 pm

» 7-year sentence for Berlusconi
by FlyingRat Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:32 pm

» New Stadium
by grumpy old man Mon May 27, 2013 4:34 pm

» Winnipeg News Android App
by grumpy old man Mon May 27, 2013 4:33 pm

» First Post
by grumpy old man Fri May 24, 2013 2:43 pm

» The New Sals at Pembina and Stafford
by grumpy old man Thu Apr 25, 2013 1:35 pm

» Emma Watson wants to do nude scenes for 50 shades of grey movie
by FlyingRat Wed Apr 24, 2013 10:39 am

» Museum finally admits it needs to raise more money priovately.
by FlyingRat Wed Apr 24, 2013 10:32 am

» And You Thought Your Taxes Are High Now!!!
by FlyingRat Wed Apr 24, 2013 10:21 am

» free chocolate sample
by cobragt Sun Mar 31, 2013 6:12 pm

» Do you want a gift certificate for A winnipeg restraunt?
by cobragt Sun Mar 31, 2013 6:12 pm


You are not connected. Please login or register

CSIS senior Official Changes His testimony To Clarify Things!

3 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

rosencrentz

rosencrentz
uber-contributor
uber-contributor

CSIS official does about-face on torture testimony





OTTAWA - A senior CSIS official has backpedalled on his admission that the spy agency uses information extracted through torture.
In a letter to the Commons public safety committee Thursday, Geoffrey O'Brian of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service said his comments to MPs this week "may have provoked some confusion."
"I wish to clarify for the committee that CSIS certainly does not condone torture and that it is the policy of CSIS to not knowingly rely upon information that may have been obtained through torture," O'Brian wrote.
He is a lawyer who provides advice on legislative issues at the spy service, where he has worked since its inception almost 25 years ago.
The letter contrasted sharply with his testimony at a committee hearing on Tuesday
O'Brian told MPs then that the agency would use information gathered through torture in the rare instance that it could prevent a catastrophic terrorist plot like the 1985 Air India bombing or the 9-11 attacks.
"The simple truth is, if we get information which can prevent something like the Air India bombing, the Twin Towers - whatever, frankly - that is the time when we will use it despite the provenance of that information."
O'Brian's comments sparked criticism of CSIS from opposition MPs and human-rights advocates. They also prompted Public Safety Minister Peter Van Loan to quiz CSIS director Jim Judd at a Tuesday night meeting about the spy agency's policy on torture.
On Thursday, Van Loan told the committee he's willing to issue a written directive to CSIS prohibiting the use of information from torture - a signal welcomed by NDP public safety critic Jack Harris.

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/CSIS-official-does-about-face-on-torture-testimony.html
We just never will know what is really going on with the police, the RCMP, CSIS', or any bureaucratic, or governmental agency!
They lie, they cheat and if they do tell us what is happening, they then tell us that they want to correct what they said to conform to what they meant to say!

http://www.elansofas.com

Guest

Anonymous
Guest

What would Jack Bauer do?

Freeman

Freeman
uber-contributor
uber-contributor

JTF wrote:What would Jack Bauer do?

Shoot someone in the kneecap to get the truth!

Guest

Anonymous
Guest

If they squeeze his balls to tight to stop another 911 then be my quest. Don't worry about all the do good thumb up there ass people who will whine . Toughest decision they have is What to have with their double double .

Get real they are extracting information of National security , and could save your life . People the terriost wants to kill you .

grumpy old man

grumpy old man
administrator
administrator

Where do we draw the line Pavolo? We have the society we do because some people many many moons ago had the foresight to implement the right amount of checks and balances. We begin ignoring these checks and balances we begin sliding down that slippery slope.

No, we must draw the line somewhere. The question is not so much what they do but how far are we willing to let them go.

I don't want our security people ignoring the rules we as Canadians put in place for them.

Guest

Anonymous
Guest

As I understand it, everyone that counts, perfectly well knows that information gleaned from a tortured suspect is unreliable. They don't beat people to get information. They beat people to hurt them and bring them to a point of knowledge, nothing more.

Real and reliable information is gained over time and without physical intervention. Some do call this 'mental torture'.

But let's face it, some people think the act of locking someone up is an act of torture.

So, who ya' gonna' please eh?

Guest

Anonymous
Guest

True but if they hold him and inconvience him to bad for him . There has to be a reason to do it .

grumpy old man

grumpy old man
administrator
administrator

Pavolo wrote:True but if they hold him and inconvience him to bad for him . There has to be a reason to do it .
Just like there has to be a reason to hold someone in an airport eh? Heh heh.

Guest

Anonymous
Guest

Well, if they wish to play games at the airport, they can. Anyone with a gun can detain anyone else, afterall.

However, they sure as hell better have a good and lawful reason that stands the smell test, for if they don't, lawyers always trump guns after detention.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum